Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Comparison of totally visceral sac separation (TVS) and extended view totally extraperitoneal (e-TEP) repair for umbilical and epigastric hernias: a retrospective study.

Created on 23 May 2025

Authors

Bo Zhuang, Yu Zhou, Shian Yu, Yaoqi Zhang, Gang Li

Published in

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery. Volume 29. Issue 1. Pages 176. May 23, 2025. Epub May 23, 2025.

Abstract

Totally visceral sac separation (TVS) is a novel concept proposed for hernia repair, preserving the integrity of the posterior rectus sheath (PRS). The aim of this study was to compare the results of TVS with the extended view totally extraperitoneal (e-TEP) method for umbilical and epigastric hernias.
A retrospective comparison analysis was conducted including 45 e-TEP and 43 TVS procedures performed between June 2021 and June 2024. Baseline characteristics, surgical records, and postoperative information were collected and analyzed for both groups from the electronic medical records system.
The baseline characteristics showed no significant differences. The TVS group had a significantly longer mean operative time (230 (36) minutes vs. 190 (84) minutes, P<0.01) and used a smaller mesh area (120 (10) cm² vs. 130 (20) cm², P<0.01). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of quality of life scores, postoperative length of stay, and medical expenses. One patient in the e-TEP group experienced surgical site and mesh infection, requiring mesh removal and resulting in hernia recurrence.
Despite its complexity and longer operative time, the TVS approach offers potential advantages in long-term outcomes and complication management for umbilical and epigastric hernias. These findings contribute to the understanding and potential adoption of the TVS technique in hernia repair.

PMID:
40407909
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 May 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 21
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement