Performance-Based Differences in Prefrontal Cortex Activation: Assessing Dynamic Marksmanship Performance Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.

Authors

Owen F Salmon, Thomas X Statz, Cierra B Ugale, Matthew D Segovia, Joshua R Thompson, Hunter D Dobbs, Rachel M Rauth, Cory M Smith

Published in

Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals. May 24, 2025. Epub May 24, 2025.

Abstract

Marksmanship is a fundamental skill for all servicemembers. However, the underlying neurophysiological differences in performance among marksmen remain unclear. Incorporating neurophysiological tracking such as functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) may identify performance-based differences in prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation during dynamic marksmanship scenarios. This study examined cognitive load within the PFC during a simulated dynamic marksmanship scenario in non-proficient and proficient marksmen.
Twenty-four participants (12 men, 12 women) wore an fNIRS device over their forehead during a simulated stationary pistol marksmanship task (to determine proficiency status) and a dynamic shoot/no-shoot course of fire (COF) (to assess cognitive load). Relative concentrations of oxyhemoglobin (HbO2 ), deoxygenated hemoglobin (deoxygenated Hb), and total hemoglobin (total Hb) were tracked to quantify PFC activation differences in twelve proficient (=80% hit percentage) and twelve non-proficient (<80% hit percentage) marksmen.
No difference in completion time was observed between groups during the dynamic COF (p=.34). However, non-proficient marksmen showed 26.3% higher HbO2 (p=.02) and 42.1% higher total Hb (p<.01) in the PFC compared to proficient marksmen.
Tracking PFC hemodynamic activity identified proficiency-based differences in cognitive load during a dynamic COF. Applying fNIRS during marksmanship-related tasks may be useful in developing stress resilience and mission readiness for servicemembers.

PMID:
40411779
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 May 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.