Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Electrodermal activity and subjective annoyance in speech recognition tasks with noise as stress indicators.

Created on 27 May 2025

Authors

Beatriz Peixoto Perini, Massimiliano Masullo, Alessandra Giannella Samelli

Published in

International journal of audiology. Pages 1-8. May 26, 2025. Epub May 26, 2025.

Abstract

Noise can cause changes in the activity of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), which can be monitored through electrodermal activity (EDA). Our aim was to investigate electrodermal activity and annoyance during speech recognition tasks with competitive noise.
Cross-sectional study with forty normal-hearing adults. The EDA was monitored during relaxation in silence and three recognition tasks with monosyllables, in silence and with competitive pink noise at 65 dBA and 75 dBA. After noise conditions, a subjective scale of annoyance was administered.
There were significant differences in the latency of the first EDA signal (p < 0.001), number of EDA peaks (p < 0.001) and percentage of correct answers in the speech recognition task (p < 0.001) when comparing the conditions with and without noise. Regarding the subjective scale, there was a significant difference between the two noise conditions, with higher annoyance scores for the condition with the highest noise level (p < 0.001).
Our results suggest that the presence of competitive noise (and higher noise levels) negatively impacts the speech recognition task and increases EDA due to greater activation of the SNS, as well as more intense noise levels causing greater annoyance, possibly resulting from higher levels of stress and listening effort.

PMID:
40418750
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 May 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 17
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement