Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Evaluation of the antileishmanial effect of polyclonal antibodies and cationic antimicrobial peptides.

Created on 27 May 2025

Authors

Mahsa Esmaeilifallah, Hossein Khanahmad, Zahra Ghayour, Sedighe Saberi, Reza Kalantari, Seyed Hossein Hejazi

Published in

Pathogens and global health. Volume 117. Issue 4. Pages 366-380. Epub Jul 21, 2022.

Abstract

Leishmaniasis is one of the tropical and subtropical diseases which, according to WHO, has the priority of control. The list of anti-leishmanial drugs is limited and requires side effects, high costs, and long-term treatments. Various species, parasite resistance, and simultaneous diseases are among the factors that affect the effectiveness of treatment. Due to these problems and based on satisfactory records of previous studies using antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) against infectious diseases, this study aimed to evaluate the antileishmanial effect of Leishmania-infected macrophage polyclonal antibody (LIMPA) with or without different concentrations (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 100 µg/ml) of CM11 and (40, 80, and 100 µg/ml) BufIIIb, two AMPs, in vitro and their therapeutic effects against CL of Balb/c mice. Results showed that LIMPA induced an anti-proliferative effect on Leishmania major growth in macrophages in vitro and intramacrophage-amastigotes in vivo. CM11 with IC50 of 8.73 and 10.10 μg/ml at 48 hours, and BufIIIb with IC50 of 66.83 and 80.26 μg/ml, at 24 hours showed the most significant inhibition of L. major promastigotes and amastigotes. In addition, the CM11 and BufIIIb, with a CC50 of 9.7 μg/ml and 40.34 μg/ml, showed the most significant inhibition effect on the J774.A1 cell line at 48 hours, respectively. In addition, in vivo experiments using LIMPA with a 0.01 mg/kg dosage showed a significant difference (p < 0.001) in the last week of the measurement compared to the control. The results of this study may be a promising prospect for further investigations.

PMID:
35861705
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 May 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement