Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

[Qualitative evaluation of an intervention on condom use among Mexican adolescents: criticisms of adultcentrism].

Created on 05 Jun 2025

Authors

Alma Angélica Villa-Rueda, Yolanda Viridiana Chávez-Flores, Liliana Leticia Juárez-Medina, Erick Alberto Landeros-Olvera, Adriana Ruiz-Peréz

Published in

Ciencia & saude coletiva. Volume 30. Issue 5. Pages e15982023. Epub Jan 10, 2024.

Abstract

This article qualitatively evaluates the "Usando Condón" intervention aimed at increasing condom use by Mexican adolescents, from the standpoint of criticism of adultcentrism as a system of oppression. A qualitative evaluation was developed through written narratives of 132 people from the experimental group between 15-19 years of age. The intervention consisted of two 90-minute sessions, and thematic analysis was used to analyze the narratives, which were then processed using Nvivo software. The analysis and discussion were based on adultcentrism as a system of oppression. The results of the evaluation were categorized into three themes with respect to: thematic-practical content, facilitator characteristics, and recommendations. The three categories reflected on adultcentrism as a system of oppression and a critique of the power-knowledge discourse of traditional sexual health interventions emerged. It was perceived that the intervention was implemented without taboos, with real examples where the people involved were peers, that the person implementing the intervention was young, that there was enough material to model condom use and that it was a safe space to share doubts. Above all, it was considered that the intervention promoted the exercise of sexual rights.

PMID:
40465929
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Jun 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 33
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement