Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

[Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Profile in Atypical Alzheimer's Disease].

Created on 05 Jun 2025

Authors

Elisa Martínez Campos, Paula Tellechea Aramburo, Javier Sánchez Ruiz de Gordoa, Rosa Larumbe Ilundain

Published in

Revista de neurologia. Volume 80. Issue 4. Pages 36399. May 22, 2025.

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are essential for the early identification of non-amnestic phenotypes. Increased levels of total tau (t-tau) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) have been reported in atypical AD cases, although the specific pattern remains a subject of debate. This study aimed to evaluate CSF biomarker profiles in relation to clinical phenotype.
A retrospective review was performed, analyzing demographic data, time to diagnosis, clinical phenotype, and core AD biomarkers (beta-amyloid peptide 1-42 (Aβ1-42), t-tau, p-tau) in CSF from patients evaluated at University Hospital in Navarra between 2019 and 2022.
The study included 57 patients (54% female, mean age 67 years), of whom 41 met AD diagnostic criteria. Among these, 10 patients (25%) presented with atypical phenotypes (50% aphasic, 30% frontal, 20% mixed non-amnestic). Compared with the amnestic phenotype, the atypical group exhibited significantly higher t-tau (562.9 pg/mL vs 320.3 pg/mL, p = 0.021) and p-tau (81.5 pg/mL vs 37.7 pg/mL, p = 0.016) levels, independent of age, sex, and time to diagnosis.
Atypical cases demonstrated increased tau levels, suggesting earlier and more extensive cortical damage than the amnestic phenotype. These findings underscore the significance of CSF biomarkers in phenotypic differentiation, disease course prediction, and individualized treatment strategies for AD.

PMID:
40464420
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Jun 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 20
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement