Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Risk factors for the prognostic effects of patients with pelvic abscesses: a clinical retrospective study.

Created on 05 Jun 2025

Authors

Lei Yang, Juhua Zhong, Huihua Chen, Chen Gao, Tingting Lin, Liangyu Chen, Zhenwen Zhang, Yang Lin, Yiyi Zheng

Published in

BMC women's health. Volume 25. Issue 1. Pages 276. Jun 04, 2025. Epub Jun 04, 2025.

Abstract

Pelvic abscesses represent acute gynecological emergencies requiring timely intervention. This study evaluated prognostic predictors and treatment modalities in patients with pelvic abscesses.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 127 consecutive pelvic abscess cases treated at Ningde Municipal Hospital between 2016 and 2021. Patients were stratified by treatment modality (non-surgical, laparoscopic, open surgery). Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to assess the associations between risk factors and prognostic outcomes.
Non-surgical management was associated with smaller abscess size but longer recovery times compared to surgical interventions. Laparoscopic approaches exhibited superior outcomes versus open surgery in both operative time and blood loss. Multivariate analysis identified key prognostic factors included treatment modality, duration from onset to admission, pre-admission temperature, CA125 levels, and maximum mass diameter.
These findings underscore the prognostic value of early intervention, biomarker-guided decision-making, and minimally invasive approaches in pelvic abscess management. By identifying these factors, healthcare providers could effectively stratify patients based on their risk profiles, facilitating more personalized treatment strategies and improved prognostic outcomes.

PMID:
40468261
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Jun 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 22
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement