Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Design of Chinese traditional Jiaoyi (Folding chair) based on Kansei Engineering and CNN-GRU-attention.

Created on 05 Jun 2025

Authors

Xinyan Yang, Nan Zhang, Jiufang Lv

Published in

Frontiers in neuroscience. Volume 19. Pages 1591410. Epub May 21, 2025.

Abstract

This study innovatively enhances personalized emotional responses and user experience quality in traditional Chinese folding armchair (Jiaoyi chair) design through an interdisciplinary methodology.
To systematically extract user emotional characteristics, we developed a hybrid research framework integrating web-behavior data mining.
1) the KJ method combined with semantic crawlers extracts emotional descriptors from multi-source social data; 2) expert evaluation and fuzzy comprehensive assessment reduce feature dimensionality; 3) random forest and K-prototype clustering identify three core emotional preference factors: "Flexible Refinement," "Uncompromising Quality," and "ergonomic stability."
A CNN-GRU-Attention hybrid deep learning model was constructed, incorporating dynamic convolutional kernels and gated residual connections to address feature degradation in long-term semantic sequences. Experimental validation demonstrated the superior performance of our model in three chair design preference prediction tasks (RMSE = 0.038953, 0.066123, 0.0069777), outperforming benchmarks (CNN, SVM, LSTM). Based on the top-ranked preference encoding, we designed a new Jiaoyi chair prototype, achieving significantly reduced prediction errors in final user testing (RMSE = 0.0034127, 0.0026915, 0.0035955).
This research establishes a quantifiable intelligent design paradigm for modernizing cultural heritage through computational design.

PMID:
40470295
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Jun 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 26
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement