Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The relationship between self-efficacy and self-management: a moderated mediation model of self-control and emotion regulation among stroke survivors.

Created on 08 Jun 2025

Authors

Xiaoxuan Wang, Hu Jiang, Zhixin Zhao, Beilei Lin, Tao Wang, Zihao Ruan, Zhiguang Ping, Suyan Chen, Zhenxiang Zhang

Published in

Disability and rehabilitation. Pages 1-12. Jun 08, 2025. Epub Jun 08, 2025.

Abstract

To explore the impact of self-efficacy on self-management with the parallel mediating effects of impulsivity and good control, as well as the moderating effect of emotion regulation.
Convenience sampling method was used in this study. From March to July 2024, stroke patients were recruited from a tertiary hospital in Henan Province, China. Questionnaires were administered to collect sociodemographic data, self-control, self-efficacy, emotion regulation, and self-management. Descriptive statistics and Process Macro Models 4 and 14 in the SPSS program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) were used for data analysis.
A total of 519 stroke survivors reported self-management with a moderate standardization score. Impulsivity and good control co-mediating the association of self-efficacy and self-management. After adding the cognitive reappraisal as the moderator, the moderated mediation model of impulsivity was confirmed with adequate fit indices. However, cognitive reappraisal did not play a moderating role in good control and self-management.
Self-efficacy can promote self-management in stroke survivors by reducing impulsivity and enhancing self-control. Notably, cognitive reappraisal may suppress impulsive thoughts in stroke survivors and promote self-management.

PMID:
40483588
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Jun 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 20
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement