Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

"Full-naïve" patients: the impact of previous methotrexate, cyclosporine, and acitretin on first-line biologics response in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis - a monocentric retrospective study.

Created on 09 Jun 2025

Authors

Luca Mastorino, Paolo Dapavo, Orsola Crespi, Cristina Sarda, Eleonora Bongiovanni, Umberto Santaniello, Giuseppe Gallo, Pietro Quaglino, Simone RIbero

Published in

Expert opinion on biological therapy. Jun 09, 2025. Epub Jun 09, 2025.

Abstract

The impact of traditional systemic drugs to treat psoriasis (ciclosporin, methotrexate, and acitretin) in a subsequent response to biologics, has not been adequately addressed in the literature. In clinical practice it is increasingly necessary to initiate, due to concomitant comorbidities, biologics in patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who have not undergone prior treatment with systemics, i.e. full-naive.
This study analyzed the possible impact of non-biological systemic therapies on the effectiveness and drug survival of first-line biologic drug up to 12 months in bio-naive psoriatic and PsA patients consecutively enrolled from January 2017 to March 2021.
95 patients with severe psoriasis (13.5%) were full-naive. Being full-naive and having or not having undergone methotrexate or cyclosporine therapy did not impact response to subsequent years of biologic therapy. Only acitretin promotes faster response to subsequent biologic drugs with 59.6% and 74.2% of patients achieving Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 at 16 and 28 Week, respectively, vs. 50.5% and 65% (p = 0.034 and 0.026). In multivariate analysis, the advantage given by acitretin was lost.
Previous systemic therapy in bio-naive patients does not appear to result in a differential response to biologics during the first year of treatment.

PMID:
40485370
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Jun 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement