Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Persistence of nocturia after BPH surgery: a multicenter study.

Created on 20 Jun 2025

Authors

Thibaut Long Depaquit, Christopher Aguëro, Alessandro Uleri, Marvin Jourdan, Marc Fourmarier, Bastien Gondrand-Tellier, Raphaëlle Delonca, Omar Tnibar, Arthur Peyrottes, Julien Laroche, Benoit Molimard, Cyrille Bastide, Michael Baboudjian

Published in

World journal of urology. Volume 43. Issue 1. Pages 379. Jun 20, 2025. Epub Jun 20, 2025.

Abstract

Nocturia may be one of the most persistent and bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men treated for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). This study aimed to evaluate the evolution of nocturia after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) and identify predictors of no postoperative improvement.
We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of 120 men who underwent EEP for LUTS/BPO and nocturia evaluation using voiding diaries. Patients with isolated nocturia were not considered for surgery. Outcomes were categorized into complete remission, partial improvement, stability, or worsening.
At a median follow-up of 15 months, 45% of patients achieved complete remission of nocturia, 19% experienced partial improvement, 30% remained stable, and 6% worsened. The median time for improvement was 6 months. Cox regression analysis identified predominant overactive bladder symptoms as the only significant predictor of no response (HR 1.68; 95% CI, 1.01-2.82; p = 0.04). No significant association was found with age, body mass index, prostate volume, or cardiometabolic comorbidities.
This multicenter study highlights that while nocturia often persists after EEP, nearly two-thirds of patients experience meaningful improvement, emphasizing both the potential benefit of surgery and the multifactorial nature of the symptom.

PMID:
40540131
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Jun 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 31
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement