Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Comparative study of the glucose and trehalose addition on the extenders for goat sperm liquid storage.

Created on 26 Jun 2025

Authors

Md Emtiaj Alam, Most Shorifa Yeasmin, Dipak Kumar Das, Md Shohidul Islam, Soshe Ahmed, Md Hamidul Islam, Md Akhtarul Islam, Md Mostofa Kamal, Aurangazeb Kabir, Alam Khan, Md Hakimul Haque, Md Abdul Masum, Moizur Rahman, Mst Ishrat Zerin Moni

Published in

Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research. Volume 12. Issue 1. Pages 287-296. Epub Mar 26, 2025.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the effects of varying glucose and trehalose concentrations on tris-citric acid-egg yolk-fructose (TCEF) diluents for the short-term cold storage of goat semen.
The semen sample was collected, unwashed, and divided into the following groups: control (TCEF without glucose and trehalose), TCEF + glucose (75, 150 mm), and TCEF + trehalose (75, 150 mm). Each experimental sperm group (sperm concentration: 9 × ×107/ml) was kept at 4°C in a refrigerator. The impact of varying glucose and trehalose levels on the quality of the spermatozoa was assessed at different time points: after dilution and at 5, 24, 48, and 72 h of refrigeration.
After dilution, progressive motility (PM), total motility (TM), sperm viability (SV), functional integrity (FI), and acrosome integrity of G-75, G-150, T-75, and T-150 did not differ significantly from the control. The PM, TM, SV, FI, and acrosome integrity of sperm of T-150 were considerably lower than the control, G-75, G-150, and T-75 after 5 and 24 h of cool storage. The T-75 group showed superior PM, TM, and FI after 48 h of cool storage, with noticeably greater values than the other groups.
This study indicates that trehalose is a more favorable sugar than glucose for 48 h cool storage of buck semen, providing greater advantages in PM, TM, and PMI.

PMID:
40568510
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Jun 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement