Ultrasound Imaging and Machine Learning to Detect Missing Hand Motions for Individuals Receiving Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Nerve-Pain Prevention.

Authors

Anna Rita E Moukarzel, Justin Fitzgerald, Marcus Battraw, Clifford Pereira, Andrew Li, Paul Marasco, Wilsaan M Joiner, Jonathon Schofield

Published in

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Volume PP. Jul 04, 2025. Epub Jul 04, 2025.

Abstract

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) was initially developed as a technique for bionic prosthetic control but has since become a widely adopted strategy for managing pain and preventing neuroma formation after amputation. This shift in TMR's motivation has influenced surgical approaches, in ways that may challenge conventional electromyography (EMG)-based prosthetic control. The primary goal is often to simply reinnervate nerves to accessible muscles. This contrasts the earlier, more complex TMR surgeries that optimize EMG signal detection by carefully selecting target muscles near the skin's surface and manipulate residual anatomy to electrically isolate muscle activity. Consequently, modern TMR surgeries can involve less consideration for factors such as the depth of the reinnervated muscles or electrical crosstalk between closely located reinnervated muscles, all of which can impair the effectiveness of conventional prosthetic control systems. We recruited 4 participants with TMR, varying levels of upper limb loss, and diverse sets of reinnervated muscles. Participants attempted performing movements with their missing hands and we used a muscle activity measurement technique that employs ultrasound imaging and machine learning (sonomyography) to classify the resulting muscle movements. We found that attempted missing hand movements resulted in unique patterns of deformation in the reinnervated muscles and applying a K-nearest neighbors machine learning algorithm, we could predict 4-10 hand movements for each participant with 83.3-99.4% accuracy. Our findings suggest that despite the shifting motivations for performing TMR surgery this new generation of the surgical procedure not only offers prophylactic benefits but also retains promising opportunities for bionic prosthetic control.

PMID:
40614146
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Jul 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.