Evaluating implementation preparedness for suicide screening and referral in a Nepali emergency department: A mixed-methods study.

Authors

Anmol P Shrestha, Roshana Shrestha, Ajay Risal, Renu Shakya, Kripa Sigdel, Riya Bajracharya, Pratiksha Paudel, Divya Gumudavelly, Emilie Egger, Sophia Zhuang, Lakshmi Vijayakumar, Ashley Hagaman

Published in

Implementation research and practice. Volume 6. Pages 26334895251343644. Epub Jul 06, 2025.

Abstract

Most research on appropriate, feasible, and effective suicide screening has excluded research conducted in non-Western and low-income settings. This study explores preparedness and co-designing a suicide screening and referral intervention in a Nepali emergency department (ED) using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
To assess implementation readiness and context, we conducted eight key informant interviews and four focus-group discussions with clinical staff along with 3 months of embedded ethnography. We also assessed clinical staff (n = 26) knowledge, attitudes, current practices, confidence, and institutional priorities surrounding implementing suicide screening using structured questionnaires. Qualitative analysis used CFIR to assess feasibility, acceptability, and necessary implementation strategies for a suicide screening intervention within the context of this resource-strained ED. We report descriptive statistics of quantitative findings using a convergent analytic mixed-methods approach.
Qualitatively, clinicians expressed hopelessness and reservations surrounding ED programs to prevent suicide given important system and social barriers. Additionally, they doubted their ability to meaningfully overcome broader structural issues in their patients' lives (e.g., poverty and family tension) that they believed more directly determined suicidal behavior and thwarted help seeking. They discussed practical and emotional motivators for doing suicide prevention work, which highlighted departmental leadership and deep teamwork that motivated action despite wider societal myths that suicide cannot easily be prevented. Quantitative assessments largely supported these findings, indicating shared beliefs that suicide prevention was important and supported by leadership. However, providers frequently endorsed suicide myths and noted barriers including difficult interdepartmental collaboration, limited confidence in suicide prevention communication and suicide screening.
In under-resourced settings, staff must contend with competing responsibilities and complex structural causes of suicide and barriers to treatment. These can impede implementation of suicide screening interventions and must be integrated into the co-design of implementation strategy selection and deployment.
NCT06094959 clinicaltrials.gov.

PMID:
40630920
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Jul 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.