Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Comparison of the Relationships between Traditional and Regional Bone Mineral Density Values and Strength and Lean Mass for Younger and Older Women.

Created on 10 Jul 2025

Authors

Michele LeBlanc, Tracy White, Steve Hawkins

Published in

Journal of mid-life health. Volume 16. Issue 2. Pages 137-143. Epub Jun 23, 2025.

Abstract

While studies focused on the relationships between bone mineral density (BMD) and strength or lean body mass have been conducted, there are not studies that have investigated these relationships for both age groups using the same methodology and population criteria (especially physical activity levels).
The aim of this study was to compare the relationships between traditional and regional bone mineral density (BMD) and strength and lean mass values in younger and older women.
Forty-four younger (18-30 years) and 40 older (65-80 years) healthy females were recruited for this study. All had a physical activity rating of four or lower on the Physical Activity Rating Questionnaire. Muscle strength was tested for hand grip, leg press, and isokinetic knee flexion and extension. Total and regional lean body mass and BMD values were determined using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Correlations and stepwise regressions were run between traditional (hip, spine, and forearm) and regional (arm and leg) BMD and strength and lean mass values. Significance was determined with P < 0.05.
The relationships for traditional BMD and strength measures for the two groups were quite similar with few significant relationships being identified for either group. The two groups had differing relationships between traditional BMD values and lean mass measures. The relationships between regional BMD and strength and lean mass values had good agreement for the two groups for the arm, but not the leg.
The relationships investigated were most similar between the two age groups for the upper body but did not have good agreement for the lower body. These differences were likely due to greater declines in muscle quality associated with aging that occur more drastically for the lower body.

PMID:
40636845
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Jul 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 27
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement