Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Do stricter criteria for intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring reduce the risk of persistence or reoperation in primary hyperparathyroidism? A receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Created on 10 Jul 2025

Authors

Henning Wendelin Wolf, Sara Canovi, Christian Andreas Nebiker

Published in

Langenbeck's archives of surgery. Volume 410. Issue 1. Pages 220. Jul 10, 2025. Epub Jul 10, 2025.

Abstract

Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) measurement is a beneficial tool in the surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism. The expected degree of intraoperative PTH reduction, which guides surgical decision-making, determines the sensitivity and specificity of this test. While stricter criteria may enhance diagnostic accuracy, an optimal threshold has not been conclusively established. The aim of this study was to identify the PTH reduction threshold that provides the highest sensitivity and specificity for achieving biochemical cure.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 141 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism, focusing on the intraoperative drop in PTH and surgical success. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to identify the optimal threshold that balances sensitivity and specificity in predicting biochemical cure.
The mean percentage reduction at the end of surgery was 73.93% (SD ± 16.54%) with an overall cure rate of 94%. The area under the curve was 0.73 for a 50% PTH reduction, 0.77 for a 60% reduction, and 0.68 for a 70% reduction.
The optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity was achieved with a 60% intraoperative PTH reduction. Stricter criteria increase sensitivity but may also raise the risk of surgical overtreatment.

PMID:
40637883
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Jul 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 45
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement