Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

General auditory processes contribute to the effect of carrier sentences on phonemic categorization of temporally based word contrasts.

Created on 12 Jul 2025

Authors

Zilong Xie

Published in

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. Volume 158. Issue 1. Pages 317-328. Jul 01, 2025.

Abstract

Sensitivity to temporal cues in word segments decreases when preceded by carrier sentences in acoustic and electric hearing, compared to isolated target words. This study examined the extent to which the carrier sentence effect is driven by speech-specific mechanisms or general auditory processes in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant simulations. A secondary objective was to determine the relative contributions of peripheral and central processes. Participants completed phonemic categorization tasks on unprocessed and vocoded versions of a Buy/Pie word contrast with varying voice-onset times (VOTs). Carrier sentences and spectrally matched non-speech carriers were presented to either the same or a different ear than the target words. Presenting stimuli to different ears minimizes peripheral contributions. Results revealed that in the same-ear condition, sensitivity to VOT cues was reduced for unprocessed and vocoded stimuli across all carrier conditions compared to isolated target words. Notably, the reduction in sensitivity to VOT cues with non-speech carriers was comparable to or even greater than with carrier sentences. In contrast, no reduction in VOT sensitivity was observed in the different-ear condition following carrier stimuli. These findings suggest that general auditory processes, likely at peripheral levels, play a major role in the carrier sentence effect on temporal processing.

PMID:
40644585
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Jul 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 51
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement