Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Bone Remodelling in Lumbar Spine: A Comparative Analysis of Ti-Alloy, PEEK and CFR-PEEK Implant Materials.

Created on 14 Jul 2025

Authors

Kishore Pradeep, Swapnil Mahadev Dhobale, Bidyut Pal

Published in

International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering. Volume 41. Issue 7. Pages e70071.

Abstract

Long-term performance-based study to comprehend the biomechanics of Ti-6Al-4V, PEEK and CFR-PEEK implant materials in fusing a lumbar spine is not available in literature. The present study investigates the performance of these implant materials in fusing an L4-L5 segment by executing a strain energy density-based bone remodelling theory. The FE models of intact and implanted lumbar spines were reconstructed from computed tomography scan images and simulated for 500 N compressive load and a combination of 150 N preload and 10 Nm moment. The models attained equilibrium state when the apparent bone density change became less than 0.005 g cm-3 between two consecutive iterations. The implanted models' range of motion (ROM) has been reduced by 73%-85% for Ti-6Al-4V, 64%-78% for PEEK and 69%-81% for CFR-PEEK implanted models. All models exhibit a substantial rise in bone density (30%) in the implant-bone interface region and cancellous bone. However, the CFR-PEEK implanted model exhibited a bone density loss of only 0%-0.3%, compared to the Ti-6Al-4V implanted model (0.3%-6.7%) and the PEEK model (1.5%-30%). The findings indicate that CFR-PEEK material may be a better implant material than PEEK and Ti-6Al-4V while considering bone density distributions and equivalent strains from immediate post-operative to equilibrium conditions.

PMID:
40653992
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Jul 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 53
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement