Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

HMGB1 and TLR4 as biomarkers for osteoporosis risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study.

Created on 15 Jul 2025

Authors

Guang Zhu, Chunting Kan, Changchun Cao, Hong Zhu

Published in

BMC endocrine disorders. Volume 25. Issue 1. Pages 175. Jul 14, 2025. Epub Jul 14, 2025.

Abstract

This study explored the application value of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) levels in the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with osteoporosis (OP).
This was a cross-sectional study of 126 patients. The patients with T2DM was stratified into the following three subgroups: normal bone mass, osteopenia, and OP. Comparative analyses of general data and biochemical indices were performed, and Pearson's correlation was used to assess the relationship among HMGB1, TLR4 levels, and bone mineral density (BMD). Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors in patients with T2DM. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of HMGB1 and TLR4 levels for OP in patients with T2DM.
HMGB1 and TLR4 levels were significantly higher in the OP group than in the normal bone mass and osteopenia groups (p < 0.05). Pearson's correlation analysis revealed a negative association among BMD, HMGB1, and TLR4 levels. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified Mg, HMGB1, and TLR4 as significant OP risk factors for T2DM. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the areas under the curve for HMGB1 and TLR4 in predicting OP in patients with T2DM were 0.828 and 0.854, respectively, with respective sensitivities of 79.4% and 94.1% and respective specificities of 78.3% and 58.7%.
Serum HMGB1 and TLR4 levels may be potential biomarkers for OP in patients with T2DM.
Not applicable.

PMID:
40660211
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Jul 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 36
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement