Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Anger superiority effect or happiness superiority effect: how the distractor homogeneity modulates the asymmetry in searching emotional faces?

Created on 17 Jul 2025

Authors

Xiaofan Jiang, Shenli Peng, Zhan Xu

Published in

Cognition & emotion. Pages 1-14. Jul 16, 2025. Epub Jul 16, 2025.

Abstract

Numerous studies have examined the search asymmetry between angry and happy faces, contrasting the Anger Superiority Effect (ASE) and Happiness Superiority Effect (HSE). Building on this work, the current study investigates how distractor homogeneity modulates these emotional search asymmetries. Using behavioral and eye-tracking measures, we analyze both "target guidance" and "distractor rejection" mechanisms to provide a nuanced understanding of attentional allocation during emotional face detection. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants completed identical visual search tasks. Both experiments yielded consistent results: ASE emerged under homogeneous backgrounds, while HSE appeared under heterogeneous conditions. Experiment 2 further employed regression analysis on eye-tracking metrics and reaction times, revealing two key findings: (a) In homogeneous searches, angry faces showed stronger attentional guidance, indicating their detection advantage during feature-based processing; (b) In heterogeneous searches, happy face detection benefited from more efficient distractor rejection during conjunction-based processing. These results demonstrate that distractor homogeneity dynamically influences emotional search asymmetries by engaging distinct attentional strategies. The study advances theoretical frameworks of emotion and attention by highlighting condition-dependent mechanisms underlying ASE and HSE.

PMID:
40668942
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Jul 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 61
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement