Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The effect of cone beam computed tomography voxel size on age estimation: A three-dimensional surface area analysis study.

Created on 21 Jul 2025

Authors

Meghna Gohain, Muhammad Khan Asif, Phrabhakaran Nambiar, Amir Hazwan Abdul Rahim, Nora Sakina Mohd Noor, Norliza Ibrahim

Published in

Journal of forensic sciences. Jul 20, 2025. Epub Jul 20, 2025.

Abstract

Accurate three-dimensional (3D) age estimation relies on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image quality. This study investigated the effect of voxel size on age estimation using 3D surface area analysis (3D SAA) of developing tooth apices from different CBCT systems. CBCT scans of 128 developing maxillary second premolars from children aged 7-14 years of Malay and Chinese ethnicities were retrospectively collected using a voxel size of 76 μm. The surface area of the developing apex was measured using the 3D SAA method. A previously developed regression formula, based on 300 μm voxel size data, was applied to calculate the mean absolute error (MAE) for the 76 μm voxel data. A strong negative correlation (r = 0.960) was found between chronological age (CA) and root surface area of apex (RSAA). An MAE value of 0.51 was obtained, demonstrating the high accuracy of the existing regression model. RSAA and root development status significantly contributed to age estimation (p < 0.05), except for sex (p = 0.37) and ethnicity (p = 0.49). No significant differences in the correlation strength between CA and RSAA (p = 0.09), the correlation coefficient (p = 0.08), and the MAE values (p = 0.13) were observed when tested against the previous 300 μm findings. This study demonstrated that the 3D SAA-based age estimation model performs consistently across both voxel sizes. As smaller voxel sizes did not significantly improve accuracy, the use of larger voxel sizes may be preferred to reduce radiation exposure, especially in pediatric populations.

PMID:
40685256
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Jul 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 39
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement