Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Clinician Risk Tolerance and Rates of Admission From the Emergency Department for Medicare Patients.

Created on 29 Jul 2025

Authors

Peter B Smulowitz, Daniel Ostrovsky, Ryan C Burke, Victor Novack, Linda Isbell, Vincent Kan, Lawrence Zaborski, Bruce E Landon

Published in

Annals of emergency medicine. Jul 28, 2025. Epub Jul 28, 2025.

Abstract

To characterize the association between emergency department (ED) clinician risk tolerance and the decision to admit, a common and high-cost decision.
In this observational cohort study, data on 100% of traditional Medicare beneficiaries for all ED visits in Massachusetts from October 2015 through September 2020 were linked to surveys of clinician risk tolerance. We estimated a generalized mixed-effect linear regression model to assess the association between the risk scales, divided into tertiles, and the decision to admit. The main outcome measure was ED disposition, defined as admitted or discharged to home. Risk tolerance was measured using 4 related scales: the Risk-Taking Scale, the Stress from Uncertainty Scale, the Fear of Malpractice Scale, and the Need for (Cognitive) Closure Scale.
The total study sample included 421,301 ED visits seen by 889 emergency clinicians. Patients were predominantly women (57.4%), and the average age was 72.6 years. Mean clinician age was 46.5 years. In total, 77.1% were physicians, 59.3% were men, and 86.6% were White. We found a consistent relationship between lower risk tolerance and higher admission rates. This magnitude of the relationship was stronger for conditions with a higher rate of admissions.
The risk scales were significantly associated with the tendency to admit. This suggests that clinician risk tolerance meaningfully contributes to variation in clinician behavior and points to the potential utility for interventions that interface with clinician behavior to affect admission rates.

PMID:
40728454
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Jul 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 72
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement