Authors
Anurag Jain, Abhishek Mahato, Divya Gupta, Madan Gopal Vishnoi, Vivek Tiwari, Vikrant Balaan, Awadhesh Tiwari, Avinash Jadhav
Published in
Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India. Volume 40. Issue 2. Pages 62-66. Epub Jun 27, 2025.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) and CT performance in guiding percutaneous biopsies with histologic confirmation of lung lesions.
We prospectively evaluated 50 patients, of whom 25 underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT-guided biopsy and 25 underwent CT-guided biopsy. The pathology results, diagnostic performance, procedure duration, and complications in the two groups were evaluated.
Of the 25 biopsies with PET/CT guidance, histology demonstrated a mean diagnostic accuracy of 97.62%. In the CT-guided group, the mean diagnostic accuracy was 85%. The t-test revealed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.00001).
PET/CT-guided biopsy of lung lesions led to fewer inconclusive biopsies than CT-guided biopsy, with similar complication rates. This study highlights that PET-CT-guided lung biopsies, especially when robot-assisted, provide superior diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, PET-CT-guided biopsies exhibit a high sensitivity and low complication rates, making them a reliable and safe option for biopsy procedures. However, limitations related to study design, procedural learning curves, and radiation exposure should be carefully considered.
PMID:
40735763
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Jul 2025.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 69
- Comments 0