Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Robotic Assistance in PET-CT-guided Lung Biopsies: Enhancing Accuracy and Clinical Outcomes.

Created on 30 Jul 2025

Authors

Anurag Jain, Abhishek Mahato, Divya Gupta, Madan Gopal Vishnoi, Vivek Tiwari, Vikrant Balaan, Awadhesh Tiwari, Avinash Jadhav

Published in

Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India. Volume 40. Issue 2. Pages 62-66. Epub Jun 27, 2025.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) and CT performance in guiding percutaneous biopsies with histologic confirmation of lung lesions.
We prospectively evaluated 50 patients, of whom 25 underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT-guided biopsy and 25 underwent CT-guided biopsy. The pathology results, diagnostic performance, procedure duration, and complications in the two groups were evaluated.
Of the 25 biopsies with PET/CT guidance, histology demonstrated a mean diagnostic accuracy of 97.62%. In the CT-guided group, the mean diagnostic accuracy was 85%. The t-test revealed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.00001).
PET/CT-guided biopsy of lung lesions led to fewer inconclusive biopsies than CT-guided biopsy, with similar complication rates. This study highlights that PET-CT-guided lung biopsies, especially when robot-assisted, provide superior diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, PET-CT-guided biopsies exhibit a high sensitivity and low complication rates, making them a reliable and safe option for biopsy procedures. However, limitations related to study design, procedural learning curves, and radiation exposure should be carefully considered.

PMID:
40735763
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Jul 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 69
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement