Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Using Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Active Middle Ear and Bone Conduction Implant Users: An Objective Method to Optimize the Fitting.

Created on 06 Aug 2025

Authors

Marcus Voola, Lorenzo Vignali, Hamidreza Mojallal, Caris Bogdanov, Dayse Távora-Vieira

Published in

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. Aug 05, 2025. Epub Aug 05, 2025.

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate whether cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) measures could be used to optimize active middle ear implant (aMEI) and bone conduction implant (BCI) fitting, with the goal of improving hearing outcomes in adults.
CAEPs were measured in response to LING sounds /OO/, /AH/, and /SH/ presented in sound field. If CAEP responses were recorded for all sounds, no map adjustments were performed. If a CAEP response was absent for one or more sounds, map parameters were optimized until a CAEP response could be induced. Functional outcomes were measured as pre- vs postoptimization adaptive speech-in-noise results. Subjective feedback was also collected.
Of the 15 participants, one was excluded from the study, three did not need optimization, nine were successfully optimized using CAEP measurements, and two could not be optimized. Comparison of CAEP morphology showed significant differences pre- vs postoptimization for middle- and high-frequency sounds (i.e., /AH/ and /SH/). Speech-in-noise testing revealed significant improvements pre- vs postoptimization, and participants were generally satisfied with the overall procedure.
These findings demonstrated that middle- and high-frequency tokens could be successfully optimized using CAEPs, resulting in significant improvements in hearing performance. Our results support the use of CAEPs for the optimization of aMEI and BCI adult users' fitting.

PMID:
40763175
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Aug 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 69
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement