Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Autonomous ground vehicles for MEDEVAC: capability assessment based on agent-based modelling.

Created on 15 Aug 2025

Authors

Dalibor Procházka, V Šedivcová, J Melichar, A Tesař, H Schvach

Published in

BMJ military health. Aug 14, 2025. Epub Aug 14, 2025.

Abstract

Medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) is a crucial component of military healthcare, and the time during which evacuation of the wounded, injured and ill individuals happens is one of the most critical factors. The article focuses on the initial phase of ground evacuation from the Point of Injury to the casualty collection point (CCP). Casualty transport is the combat unit's task, triggered by a 9-liner MEDEVAC request. Two variants are considered: evacuation by means of one armoured vehicle per CCP according to the actual doctrine and potential evacuation using a fleet of autonomous unmanned vehicles.
The analysis and comparison are based on data (injury time and position) obtained from computer-assisted exercises, and a simulation combining agent-based modelling and discrete events simulation methods is applied to compare two approaches.
The simulation results show that using distributed transport capability, represented by unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs), is more effective because it allows for prioritising casualties based on the injury category. The evacuation effectiveness is quantified in relation to the number of UGVs used.
The use of UGVs can improve the care of the wounded, assuming the involvement of advanced technologies, including artificial intelligence. Information about the time and place of casualties is the key for decision makers to achieve the benefit, which should be ensured through potential monitoring of the physical condition of the wounded (body sensors and data transmission in case of injury).

PMID:
40813056
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Aug 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 75
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement