Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction in a Private Clinic: Clinical Outcomes from 2013 to 2024.

Authors

Rivi Haiat Factor, Hagit Ofir, Haim Kaplan

Published in

The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ. Volume 27. Issue 8. Pages 510-514.

Abstract

The incidence of autologous breast reconstruction has been steadily increasing in recent years. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction is considered the gold standard for breast reconstruction despite its demanding technical expertise, time intensiveness, and rigorous postoperative monitoring.
We retrospectively collected data from 102 DIEP flaps utilized for breast reconstruction in 70 patients treated at private clinics between 2013 and 2024. All surgeries were performed by a single, experienced surgeon.
The mean age at surgery was 42.2 ± 8 years. Immediate reconstructions were conducted in 34 patients (48%); 46% of patients had prior radiation therapy. Only one patient received adjuvant radiation therapy. Free DIEP flaps vascularized by one (53%), two (32%), or three (10%) perforators were preferentially anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels. One patient underwent a muscle-sparing procedure due to the absence of available perforators. Total flap failure occurred in four cases (3.9%), three occurred as a unilateral loss in patients who underwent bilateral reconstruction. Postoperative revisions of the microvascular anastomosis were performed in three patients, with successful flap salvage in two (67%). Fat necrosis was diagnosed in 26 breasts (25%), only a minority of cases required follow-up surgery. All patients were managed completely in a private clinic, with none requiring hospitalization in the public system.
Free DIEP flap breast reconstruction necessitates meticulous surgical planning, a well-coordinated surgical team, and close postoperative monitoring. Nevertheless, this surgery can be safely and effectively performed in a private clinic setting, with complication rates comparable to that of the public setting.

PMID:
40819202
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Aug 2025.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.