Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Unraveling the Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity in the Oxidation Potential of Fine Particulate Matter in China.

Created on 21 Aug 2025

Authors

Yiheng Wang, Guochao Chen, Ting Liu, Peng Wang, Jianlin Hu, Hongliang Zhang

Published in

Environmental science & technology. Aug 20, 2025. Epub Aug 20, 2025.

Abstract

The oxidative potential (OP) of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is a more robust health impact indicator than mass concentration alone. While China's stringent air pollution controls have significantly reduced PM2.5 levels, the temporal evolution of OP and its relationship with PM2.5 remain unclear. This study establishes a national PM2.5 OP database (2000-2020) using a source-oriented CMAQ model. Key findings reveal that OP decreases alongside PM2.5 concentrations over the study period, but the decline in OP (16%) is less pronounced than that of PM2.5 (37%) after 2012, leading to a 35% increase in mass-normalized OP (OPm). Source apportionment analysis identifies distinct phase-specific drivers: anthropogenic secondary organic aerosols (ASOA) were the dominant contributor to OP increases (∼68%) prior to 2012, while reductions in transportation, power generation, and biomass burning emissions drove OP declines during 2012-2017. Post-2017, stringent controls on anthropogenic non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) made ASOA the dominant declining source. Notably, urban-rural disparities in OP exposure exceed those of PM2.5 mass concentrations, primarily reflecting differences in dominant emission sources. As the first nationwide study to systematically evaluate the decoupling of PM2.5 mass and OP trends in China, these findings underscore the need for targeted strategies to mitigate PM-related health risks.

PMID:
40834353
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Aug 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 58
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement