Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Field experimental study on ground treatment of high fill embankments over expansive soils.

Created on 21 Aug 2025

Authors

Bin Hou, Faning Dang, Weihua Ding, Haibin Xue, Hong Zhan

Published in

Scientific reports. Volume 15. Issue 1. Pages 30621. Aug 20, 2025. Epub Aug 20, 2025.

Abstract

In valley regions where high-fill embankments are constructed, inadequate foundation bearing capacity is a frequently encountered challenge. At the Ankang Airport relocation site, expansive soils primarily originating from the Upper to Middle Pleistocene are widely distributed, which introduces substantial safety concerns for the stability of high-fill embankments. Prior to large-scale filling, a field experimental site was selected within the project area to conduct in-situ tests for ground improvement. Two ground reinforcement techniques-dynamic compaction and gravel pile compaction using driven casing-were implemented and assessed. Evaluations of physical and mechanical properties, including plate load and standard penetration tests (SPT), were carried out before and after the improvement procedures. Test results showed that the natural foundation soil had a characteristic bearing capacity of 260 kPa. Among the applied techniques, dynamic compaction replacement proved most effective, enhancing the bearing capacity to 580 kPa. However, due to the complex stratigraphy and shallow bedrock in certain zones, dynamic compaction may negatively impact bedrock stability. Numerical modeling further validated that dynamic compaction replacement induced the smallest settlement deformation. Targeted solutions were proposed in response to the issues identified during testing, offering practical guidance for similar foundation treatments in high-fill embankments over expansive soils.

PMID:
40835986
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Aug 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 53
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement