Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Synergistic Fe/Co Doping and Vacancy Engineering for Stable RuOx in Acidic OER.

Created on 22 Aug 2025

Authors

Yan Zhao, Luyao Li, Zeyu Wang, Wenjun Li, Zhenyong Han, Yuteng Cui, Zhiyao Duan, Wanglei Wang, Xiaogang Fu

Published in

ACS applied materials & interfaces. Aug 21, 2025. Epub Aug 21, 2025.

Abstract

RuO2 is one of the most effective catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in proton-exchange membrane water electrolyzers (PEMWEs); however, its long-term stability is hindered by Ru dissolution under harsh electrochemical conditions. In this study, we explore the combined effects of metal doping and oxygen vacancy engineering on enhancing the stability performance of RuO2-based catalysts. Using Fe or Co as dopants, we demonstrate that doping not only decreases the Ru valence but also induces a significant enrichment of oxygen vacancies. The obtained Fe-RuOx and Co-RuOx catalysts exhibit small overpotentials of 191 and 203 mV at 10 mA cm-2, respectively, and both can be sustained for over 500 h in an acidic electrolyte with negligible degradation. Furthermore, both the Fe-RuOx- and Co-RuOx-based PEMWEs can operate for more than 250 h at 100 mA cm-2. Density functional theory simulation reveals that the incorporation of Fe or Co dopants could weaken the adsorption of OOH* on Ru, thereby lowering the onset potential of the OER and improving the catalytic activity. Moreover, the abundant oxygen vacancies could increase the reconstruction energy of the RuO2 (110) surface, thereby effectively suppressing Ru dissolution and enhancing catalyst stability. These findings provide valuable insights into the design of highly stable Ru-based catalysts for acid-based water electrolysis.

PMID:
40839848
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Aug 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 82
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement