Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Adaptive robust control of tea-picking-manipulator's position tracking based on dead zone compensation with modified RBF.

Created on 22 Aug 2025

Authors

Yu Han, Zhiyu Song, Wenyu Yi, Caixue Zhan

Published in

Scientific reports. Volume 15. Issue 1. Pages 30697. Aug 21, 2025. Epub Aug 21, 2025.

Abstract

Neural Network has been used in approximation of dead zone nonlinearity when modeling the manipulator control systems. However the existed method fail to minimize the possible input saturation effect and the NN mapping accuracy also be degraded, which leads to degrading in tracking precise and accuracy. To establish an accurate control model of the tea picking robot, an adaptive compensator of m-RBF (modified radial basis function neural network) and adaptive law were designed aimed at the nonlinearity units and dead zone. The closed-loop tracking error of the proposed control system is eventually going to be stable and bounded. A simulation was carried out with Simulink, which show that m-RBF provides a good approximation to characteristic of Dead zone nonlinearity, and that the control scheme based on m-RBF had a excellent and stable tracking accuracy. The tea picking experiment with six-axis manipulator verifies the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, in which the proposed method got a higher score of 95.3, near two times that of traditional PID control methods. It can be drown that the m-RBF has a faster learning rate and can avoid local minima; the control scheme based on m-RBF has a excellent performance on control accuracy, robustness and self-adaption, which is especially appropriate for real-time control, like tea picking robot.

PMID:
40841718
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Aug 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 55
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement