Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Retrospective Evaluation of Submandibular Fossa Depth In Relation To Mandibular Canal and Bone Thickness: CBCT-Based Study.

Created on 25 Aug 2025

Authors

Hasret Tanrıverdi Şahan, Mehmet Emin Doğan, Esin Akol Görgün

Published in

Current medical imaging. Aug 21, 2025. Epub Aug 21, 2025.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the depth of the SF, bone thicknesses in the buccal and lingual areas of the mandibular canal (MC), vertical positions of the SF and MC relative to each other, and the tooth level at which the deepest point of the SF was observed in the cross-sectional section.
440 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were retrospectively evaluated. The depth of the SF was determined. The buccal bone thickness (BBT) and lingual bone thickness (LBT) of the MC were measured, and the tooth alignment of the deepest point of the SF and the vertical position of the SF and MC relative to each other were determined.
In both jaws, SF depth Type I ratios were lower in males than in females, and SF depth Type III ratios were higher than in females. When the relationship between the vertical position of the MC and the region where the SF was deepest was examined, it was observed that the MC was in an inferior position in most patients.
In order to reduce the complication rate in the SF region, the relevant region should be analyzed in detail with CBCT before surgical procedures. The main limitation of our study is that the number of men and women was not equal.
SF depth and BBT values in the right and left jaws were higher in males than in females. LBT was higher in females in the right jaw. As the depth of the SF increased, BBT and LBT values decreased.

PMID:
40849784
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Aug 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 34
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement