Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cryogenic Optical Lattice Clock with 1.7×10^{-20} Blackbody Radiation Stark Uncertainty.

Created on 28 Aug 2025

Authors

Youssef S Hassan, Kyle Beloy, Jacob L Siegel, Takumi Kobayashi, Eric Swiler, Tanner Grogan, Roger C Brown, Tristan Rojo, Tobias Bothwell, Benjamin D Hunt, Adam Halaoui, Andrew D Ludlow

Published in

Physical review letters. Volume 135. Issue 6. Pages 063402. Aug 08, 2025.

Abstract

Controlling the Stark perturbation from ambient thermal radiation is key to advancing the performance of many atomic frequency standards, including state-of-the-art optical lattice clocks (OLCs). We demonstrate a cryogenic OLC that utilizes a dynamically actuated radiation shield to control the perturbation at 1.7×10^{-20} fractional frequency, a factor of ∼40 beyond the best OLC to date. Our shield furnishes the atoms with a near-ideal cryogenic blackbody radiation (BBR) environment by rejecting external thermal radiation at the part-per-million level during clock spectroscopy, overcoming a key limitation with previous cryogenic BBR control solutions in OLCs. While the lowest BBR shift uncertainty is realized with cryogenic operation, we further exploit the radiation control that the shield offers over a wide range of temperatures to directly measure and verify the leading BBR Stark dynamic correction coefficient for ytterbium. This independent measurement reduces the literature-combined uncertainty of this coefficient by 30%, thus benefiting state-of-the-art Yb OLCs operated at room temperature. We verify the static BBR coefficient for Yb at the low 10^{-18} level.

PMID:
40864928
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Aug 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 55
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement