Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Genetic Consequences of Tree Planting Versus Natural Colonisation: Implications for Afforestation Programmes in the United Kingdom.

Created on 30 Aug 2025

Authors

Guillermo Friis, Nicola Cotterill, Nadia Barsoum, Marcia Webberley, Mohammad Vatanparast, Michael Charters, Rômulo Carleial, Richard Buggs, James S Borrell

Published in

Evolutionary applications. Volume 18. Issue 8. Pages e70146. Epub Aug 27, 2025.

Abstract

The United Kingdom aims to dramatically accelerate the establishment of new woodlands by 2050, yet the impact of different afforestation strategies on landscape genetic diversity and resilience remains unclear. This study integrates environmental data, whole-genome sequencing and phenotypic assessments to compare bioclimatic envelopes, genetic diversity and plant health indicators in naturally colonised versus planted populations of pedunculate oak and silver birch. We found that registered seed stands significantly under-represent the wild bioclimatic envelopes of both species, as well as those of 21 out of 39 UK native species assessed, potentially limiting adaptive diversity in planted populations. Yet, genetic diversity metrics (π, H O and A R) based on genome-wide markers in planted populations were comparable to naturally colonised woodlands. Planted populations exhibited higher within-group coancestry and moderate genetic homogenisation among sites, possibly reducing adaptive differentiation. Naturally colonised populations showed higher inbreeding coefficients (F ROH) in both species, potentially due to fragmentation of source populations. Genotype-environment associations based on redundancy analysis revealed divergent selection at functionally relevant loci, indicating distinct selective pressures in commercial tree production versus natural colonisation. Health indicators revealed reduced browsing in planted trees, and differences in mildew and leaf-spot incidence, suggesting potential selection divergence between afforestation strategies. These findings support a role for both afforestation strategies in enhancing the resilience of future woodlands while highlighting pathway-specific risks of introducing unintended impacts on forest diversity.

PMID:
40881943
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Aug 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 21
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement