Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Optimizing the water drinking test: evaluating the reproducibility and validity of a shortened protocol: a randomized prospective trial.

Created on 02 Sep 2025

Authors

Tal Yahalomi, Hamza Rayan, Natalya Kovalyuk, Zvika Davidovich, Doron Moscovici, Itai Hacker, Shlomo Nisim, Gal Eidelsztein, Gilad Plopsky, Joseph Pikkel

Published in

International ophthalmology. Volume 45. Issue 1. Pages 368. Sep 01, 2025. Epub Sep 01, 2025.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate a a shortened Water drinking test (WDT) protocol and explore potential factors of patient characteristics such as body mass index (BMI) or Body Surface Area (BSA).
This was a prospective, randomized study comparing two validated WDT dosage regimens: 10 mL/kg and a fixed 800 mL intake. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. The initial 30 min IOP response was compared to the full 60 min test to assess correlation and predictive value. Additionally, the effect of BMI or BSA on IOP dynamics was investigated.
Of the 100 enrolled patients, 90 were randomized and the final analysis included 45 patients in the 800 mL group and 35 in the 10 mL/kg group. No significant differences were found between groups in demographic, systemic, or ocular characteristics. The WDT showed strong reproducibility, with high correlations between the 30 min and 60 min tests (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). On the contrary, BMI (r = 0.12, p = 0.26) and BSA (r = 0.16,p = 0.14) had weak correlations with IOP response.
The 30 min WDT is a reproducible and reliable method for assessing IOP fluctuations, offering a practical alternative to the full 60 min protocol. BMI and BSA had weak correlations with IOP response, suggesting that adjusting WDT outcomes based on BMI or BSA may be unnecessary.

PMID:
40889008
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Sep 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 60
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement