Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Hyperuricemia in Perimenopausal Women.

Created on 10 Sep 2025

Authors

Yu-Fei Liu, Xiao-Jing Li, Yu-Ting Li, Xue-Han Liu, Hai-Yan Gao, Tian-Ping Zhang, Chun-Mei Yang

Published in

International journal of general medicine. Volume 18. Pages 5171-5182. Epub Sep 04, 2025.

Abstract

To develop and validate a nomogram model for predicting the risk of hyperuricemia (HUA) in perimenopausal women.
In this study, physical examination information of perimenopausal women was collected at the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China. We utilized the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) and binary logistic regression to investigate the risk factors of HUA among perimenopausal women.
We finally collected 5637 patients in this study. Based on the results of Lasso-logistic regression analysis, we incorporated ten different independent variables into the risk prediction model for HUA. The risk prediction model showed good discrimination ability in both the training set (AUC=0.819; 95% CI=0.801~0.838) and validation set (AUC=0.787; 95% CI=0.756~0.818), the calibration curve demonstrates that the model was well-calibrated. In addition, we constructed HUA risk prediction models for perimenopausal women with BMI < 25.0 and BMI ≥ 25.0, respectively. The AUC of the prediction model in the population with BMI < 25.0 was 0.793, and the AUC of the prediction model in the population with BMI ≥ 25.0 was 0.765.
Our study identified several independent risk factors for HUA in perimenopausal women and developed a prediction mode, which might be used to detect the individual conditions and implement the preventive interventions.

PMID:
40927772
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Sep 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 28
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement