Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Determination of Solute Descriptors for the Solvation Parameter Model by Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography Binary and Ternary Solvent Systems: A Case Study.

Created on 21 Sep 2025

Authors

Sanka N Atapattu, Azamat Temerdashev

Published in

Journal of separation science. Volume 48. Issue 9. Pages e70283.

Abstract

The solvation parameter model is a versatile tool validated across various applications for characterizing chromatographic systems and estimating biophysical and environmental properties of interest. The general form of the solvation parameter model for applications where transfer of neutral compounds between two condensed phases uses five solute descriptors, where, except for McGowan's characteristic volume (V), the remaining four descriptors are determined using a combination of reversed-liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, and liquid-liquid partitioning experimental data. In this study, we investigated the determination of solute descriptors for the solvation parameter model using binary and ternary solvent systems in reversed-phase liquid chromatography on a single stationary phase. As a proof of concept, we replicate the descriptor values found in the WSU descriptor database with those of solute descriptors determined using reversed-phase liquid chromatography binary and ternary solvent systems on a single stationary phase for 31 compounds. As a case study, we demonstrated the application of this approach by determining solute descriptors for 13 new compounds using this proposed approach. Standard error values for the estimated descriptors ranged from 0.019 for 1-fluoro-4-nitrobenzene to 0.080 for 4-methylbenzaldehyde.

PMID:
40974567
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Sep 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 17
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement