Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Reactive Oxygen Species Counteract Zebrafish Wound Contraction and Promote Wound Healing.

Created on 21 Sep 2025

Authors

Chang Ding, Linlin Li, Yueyang Wang, Hong-Anh A Nguyen, Deva D Chan, David M Umulis, Adrian T Buganza, Qing Deng

Published in

Biophysical journal. Sep 19, 2025. Epub Sep 19, 2025.

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are second messengers that drive wound closure. However, the mechanism by which ROS regulate wound contraction to facilitate wound healing remains unclear. Here, we report that ROS counteract wound contraction by inhibiting the phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain. Acute ROS inhibition, through pharmacological perturbations, disturbs wound relaxation, delays wound closure, and impairs regrowth following amputation. Moreover, actomyosin inhibition relaxes tailfin contraction without impairing wound closure or regrowth. Over-contraction, on the other hand, impedes wound closure. Meanwhile, chronic depletion of epithelial ROS during embryonic development, achieved through morpholino-mediated knockdown of the duox gene, alters tissue stiffness, as measured using atomic force microscopy-based nanoindentation. Despite a reduced contraction force, the wound also appears to be over-contracted, with delayed healing and regrowth. An in silico linear elasticity simulation to calculate the second principal stress based on node-wise prescribed displacement recapitulated the contraction dynamics during acute and chronic ROS inhibition. Together, our results provide a novel understanding of how reactive oxygen species (ROS) facilitate wound closure, a process instrumental in restoring tissue integrity and maintaining homeostasis.

PMID:
40975783
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Sep 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 39
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement