Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A prospective study on the evaluation of a novel immunochromatographic card for the rapid detection of five carbapenemase enzymes in metallo-beta-lactamase producers.

Created on 24 Sep 2025

Authors

Jyotsna Agarwal, Vikramjeet Singh, Avneesh Sharma, Manodeep Sen, Anupam Das

Published in

Access microbiology. Volume 7. Issue 9. Epub Sep 10, 2025.

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the performance of a novel immunochromatographic (IC) card test (TRURAPID® O.K.N.V.I. RESIST-5) for rapid detection of five carbapenemase enzymes in metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing organisms, compared to real-time PCR and an Advanced Expert System (AES). Methods. Clinically isolated 100 non-duplicates of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli expressing MBL production were tested using the novel IC card, real-time PCR and the Vitek-2 AES. Sensitivity, specificity and turnaround time were evaluated. Results. The novel IC card showed high sensitivity for detecting NDM (93%) and KPC (91.7%) carbapenemases, but lower sensitivity for OXA-48 (60%), VIM (67%) and IMP (33%) compared to PCR. It had a rapid turnaround time of 15-20 min versus 5-7 h for PCR and 18-22 h for AES. Conclusion. The novel IC card offers a rapid, cost-effective approach for detecting carbapenemases, particularly NDM and KPC, in clinical microbiology practice. It may be beneficial in resource-limited settings where these enzymes are prevalent. Considering the limited sensitivity for the IMP and VIM genes, this warrants confirmatory testing by PCR. Further evaluation is needed to assess its role as a screening or confirmatory test, especially during nosocomial outbreaks.

PMID:
40989933
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Sep 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 30
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement