Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Integration of PSMA-Targeted Theranostics into Multidisciplinary Care for Improved Efficiencies and Patient Care.

Created on 01 Oct 2025

Authors

Phillip H Kuo, Erasmus Kofi Poku, Dave M Yamauchi, Susan H Cha, Maria L Parayno, Nicole E Chong, Charles B Nguyen, Sandy T Liu, Alexander M Chehrazi-Raffle, Abhishek Tripathi, Benjamin S Gerendash, Kathleen D Burns, Tanya B Dorff

Published in

Journal of nuclear medicine technology. Sep 30, 2025. Epub Sep 30, 2025.

Abstract

The widespread success of 177Lu-PSMA-617 for prostate cancer has generated unprecedented volume in theranostics. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted theranostics is possibly the most complex program in nuclear medicine, requiring interpretation of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET according to specific criteria, incorporating laboratory tests, and on-treatment imaging to guide patient management. Adding to the complexity, these patients often have aggressive disease biology, toxicities from multiple failed therapies, and significant comorbidities. This combination of complexity and growing number of patients has created the critical need for efficient integration of theranostics into regular practice. We describe here the key components of our evolving program and protocols that have improved patient care delivery within our health system. At the core of the program is the establishment of a dedicated multidisciplinary team and regular conference to provide a forum to discuss challenging cases and issues. The creation and distribution of guidelines for imaging and laboratory criteria are critical for streamlining care so that cases are properly selected for further discussion.

PMID:
41027716
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Oct 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 40
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement