Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Superficial temporal artery retrograde access for the treatment of chronic subdural hematomas.

Created on 02 Oct 2025

Authors

Akshal S Patel, Yince Loh, Luke L Jouppi, Radwan Takroni, Daniel C Norvell, Stepan Capek, Nicolas M Caffes, Majid Aljoghaiman, Aaron J Gustin, Aws A Alawi, Zane A Tymchak, Cameron G McDougall, Stephen J Monteith

Published in

Neurosurgical focus. Volume 59. Issue 4. Pages E11. Oct 01, 2025.

Abstract

Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) has ushered in a treatment paradigm shift. The objective of this study was to determine whether the superficial temporal artery (STA) could be used consistently and just as effectively compared to conventional femoral and radial artery access.
The authors retrospectively reviewed a series of consecutive cases from January 1, 2024, to February 28, 2025, where the STA was used to treat cSDH. The 90-day readmission, retreatment, and death rates were collected and compared against a set of internal comparison cases that underwent similar treatment, though via femoral or radial artery puncture.
The study included 40 patients with STA retrograde (STAR) access and 50 patients who had traditional transfemoral or radial artery approaches. In the STA group, there was significantly reduced radiation exposure (p < 0.001) and less contrast administration (p < 0.001). There were no differences between the groups in terms of the 90-day readmission (p = 0.82), retreatment (p = 0.93), or death rates (p = 0.42). One access site complication was observed after a transfemoral intervention.
STAR access is an alternative for MMA embolization in cSDH. This innovative approach can potentially rival the results achieved by traditional techniques.

PMID:
41032897
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Oct 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 34
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement