Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Early versus delayed removal of catheter for Holmium Laser lithotripsy in day surgery: a prospective study.

Created on 07 Oct 2025

Authors

Huadi Yuan, Zhicong Tan, Liyan Gao, Pinghua Hong, Hong He, Zhazha Lin, Hao Zhang, Wenjun Gao, Bohan Wang

Published in

Urologia internationalis. Pages 1-12. Oct 06, 2025. Epub Oct 06, 2025.

Abstract

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of same-day versus next-day urinary catheter removal following ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (with routine double-J stent placement) in a day surgery setting.
In this comparative study, 191 patients undergoing day-care holmium laser lithotripsy were allocated to next-day (n=94) or same-day (n=97) extubation groups. Outcomes included catheter retention duration, post-removal complications, voiding function, and recovery parameters.
No catheter-related adverse events occurred in either group. No significant differences were observed in first void volume, catheter reinsertion rates, post-catheter removal urination, lower abdominal distension, or urethral pain (p>0.05). The same-day group demonstrated significantly shorter catheter retention time (p<0.001) and earlier postoperative ambulation (p<0.001). Notably, time to spontaneous voiding was prolonged in the same-day group (p=0.009), though all values remained within physiological ranges.
Same-day catheter removal after ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy, even with routine double-J stent placement, safely reduces indwelling time and promotes early mobilization without increasing the risk of urinary retention or exacerbating stent-related discomfort. Theprotocol is feasible for day surgery populations.

PMID:
41052266
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Oct 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 50
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement