Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

High diagnostic accuracy of chronic facial pain conditions via remote consultation.

Created on 10 Oct 2025

Authors

Tathyane H N Teshima, Roddy S McMillan

Published in

Journal of oral & facial pain and headache. Volume 39. Issue 2. Pages 94-100. Epub Jun 12, 2025.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of chronic facial pain conditions through telephone consultations.
Retrospective cross-sectional service evaluation of diagnosis during remote against face-to-face consultations were compared, based on international classification of orofacial pain. Clinical data from consecutive new patients were assessed from March-May 2020 at University College London Hospitals (UCLH)-Eastman Dental Hospital, UK, reviewed independently by two specialists. Exclusion criteria included non-English speakers, patients unable to engage in consultation, unrelated pain diagnoses at assessment and inadequate documentation. Accuracy test of sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were employed.
A total of 93 patients were included, and 6 orofacial pain diagnoses met. Nearly 25% had at least one imaging test, however none demonstrated underlying cause or change of diagnosis. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 97.85% with 100% sensitivity and specificity with perfect inter-rater agreement (kappa = 1). Only persistent idiopathic facial pain and post-traumatic neuropathic pain had reduced accuracy (98.9%) and positive predictive value (75% and 50% respectively), being 100% for all other conditions.
This study showed high diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing facial pain remotely, corroborating previous reports. Further investigations and physical examinations have not changed the diagnosis or management plan. This study evidenced that remote structured consultations represent a safe strategy for accurate facial pain diagnosis that may improve clinical efficiency.

PMID:
41070537
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Oct 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 54
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement