Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Evaluation of waterlogging tolerance of Actinidia Arguta and identification of tolerant germplasm.

Created on 15 Oct 2025

Authors

Jiaqi Geng, Guangli Shi, Xiang Li, Dan Sun, Zhenxing Wang, Jun Ai

Published in

BMC plant biology. Volume 25. Issue 1. Pages 1382. Oct 14, 2025. Epub Oct 14, 2025.

Abstract

Waterlogging is an important environmental factor limiting the cultivation of Actinidia arguta.
Using the main cultivars of 'Kuilv' and 'Lvwang', the waterlogging stress was simulated by the 'double pot method'. The purpose of this study was to explore the physiological response, key indicators, and evaluation methods of A. arguta germplasm resources under waterlogging stress.
Through the observation of the correlation analysis of the R value, day 6 of the waterlogging treatment was selected as the suitable treatment to evaluate the waterlogging tolerance of A. arguta after subjecting 'Kuilv' and 'Lvwang' with differential tolerance to varying waterlogging treatments. The waterlogging index and malondialdehyde (MDA) and soluble sugar contents were selected as the key physiological indicators via stepwise linear regression analysis of 41 A. arguta resources. Based on their tolerance levels, the A. arguta resources were divided into four levels: highly tolerant, medium tolerant, less sensitive, and sensitive to waterlogging. Moreover, a morphological description method was established based on the morphological characteristics of A. arguta under waterlogging. The study has identified 0904 and Jinong No 1 germplasms as highly potential tolerant germplasms for future A.arguta improvement activities. Our research provided a theoretical basis for further breeding research on waterlogging-tolerant resources of A. arguta.

PMID:
41087893
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Oct 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 28
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement