Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Multi-year study monitoring the mercury content in the tissues of cattle sampled in the Czech Republic between 2014 and 2023.

Created on 23 Oct 2025

Authors

Martin Svoboda, Veronika Vlasakova, Danka Harustiakova, Josef Illek, Andrea Staffa, Jan Vasek, Kamila Novotna Kruzikova, Jana Cahova, Zdenka Svobodova

Published in

Veterinarni medicina. Volume 70. Issue 9. Pages 307-312. Epub Sep 26, 2025.

Abstract

Analyses of mercury concentrations in the muscle, liver and kidneys of cattle were conducted in the Czech Republic during the period from 2014 to 2023. The average mercury content in muscles, livers, and kidneys of calves was 0.000 5 ± 0.000 0 mg.kg-1, 0.002 7 ± 0.000 5 mg.kg-1, and 0.004 1 ± 0.000 8 mg.kg-1, respectively. In fattening cattle, the average mercury content in muscles, livers and kidneys was 0.000 5 ± 0.000 0 mg.kg-1, 0.002 1 ± 0.000 2 mg.kg-1 and 0.004 9 ± 0.000 3 mg.kg-1, respectively. In cows, the average mercury content in muscles, livers and kidneys was 0.000 5 ± 0.000 0 mg.kg-1, 0.002 3 ± 0.000 1 mg.kg-1 and 0.006 9 ± 0.000 3 mg.kg-1, respectively. The maximum residual limit for human consumption was exceeded in 10 kidney samples (3 calves, 6 cows, 1 fattening cattle) and 1 liver sample (calf). In all age categories, the highest mercury concentrations were found in the kidneys, lower in the livers, and the lowest in the muscles. When comparing the age groups, significantly higher mercury concentrations were observed in the kidneys of cows than in calves and fattening cattle. It can be concluded that there is still a need for further monitoring of mercury concentrations in cattle tissues in the Czech Republic.

PMID:
41127875
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Oct 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 76
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement