Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Mendelian randomization study implicates inflammaging biomarkers in retinal vasculature, cardiovascular diseases, and longevity.

Created on 25 Oct 2025

Authors

Ana Villaplana-Velasco, Nicolas Perrot, Yu Hang, Michael Chong, Emanuele Trucco, Muthu R K Mookiah, Walter Nelson, Jeremy Petch, Hertzel C Gerstein, Parminder Raina, Salim Yusuf, Miguel O Bernabeu, Albert Tenesa, Konrad Rawlik, Guillaume Pare, Alexander Doney, Erola Pairo-Castineira, Marie Pigeyre

Published in

Science advances. Volume 11. Issue 43. Pages eadu1985. Oct 24, 2025. Epub Oct 24, 2025.

Abstract

With the increasing proportion of elderly individuals, understanding biological mechanisms of aging is critical. Retinal vascular complexity, measured as fractal dimension (Df) from fundus photographs, has emerged as a vascular aging indicator. We conducted a genome-wide association study of Df on 74,434 participants from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland, and UK Biobank cohorts. We identified a novel locus near DAAM1. We found negative genetic correlations between Df and cardiovascular disease, stroke, and inflammation but a positive correlation with life span. By combining the genetic determinants of 1159 circulating proteins from the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiological cohort with those of Df using Mendelian randomization, we identified eight causal mediators, including MMP12 and IgG-Fc receptor IIb, which link higher inflammation to lower Df, increased cardiovascular disease risk, and shorter life span. These results extend our understanding of the biological pathways underlying aging processes and inform targets to prevention and treatment.

PMID:
41134885
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Oct 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 56
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement