SmartPLR: a digital solution for AI-powered smartphone pupillometry.

Authors

Kyu Lim Kim, Dong Kyu Kim, Jeong Hoon Lee, Yong Chan Kim

Published in

BMC ophthalmology. Volume 25. Issue 1. Pages 637. Nov 12, 2025. Epub Nov 12, 2025.

Abstract

To develop a smartphone-based pupillometry using deep learning and evaluate its accuracy compared to a commercial pupillometer, the NPi-300.
336 pupillary light reflex (PLR) exams from 158 volunteers were analyzed using deep learning models (UNet, UNet++, DeepLabV3, DeepLabV3+, and Mask R-CNN) with different backbones (ResNet50, Swin Transformer, and ConvNeXt V2). Once the best combination was identified, image data was filtered according to the degree of eyelid opening and image blurriness. The maximum-minimum pupil size difference, constriction velocity (CV), and percentage change in pupil size (CP) were compared between our application and the NPi-300 gold standard. The kernel density estimation and Bhattacharyya Distance were used to develop a scoring method to classify pupil reactivity: SmartPLR.
Mask R-CNN (ConvNeXt V2 backbone), which showed a mean intersection over union of 0.9177, segmentation mean average precision (mAP) of 0.8670, and bounding box mAP of 0.8663, was selected for our application. The Pearson correlation values comparing our application to the NPi-300 for pupil size difference, CV, and CP were 0.77, 0.77, and 0.74, respectively. The SmartPLR formula was defined as [Formula: see text], and sluggish pupils were defined as [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], and urgent pupils were defined as [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text].
Despite various smartphone applications developed to evaluate the PLR, they rely on additional add-ons or infrared light source. This prevents such applications from being completely commercialized. Our novel smartphone application, built on deep learning and not requiring infrared or additional devices, demonstrated high accuracy compared to the NPi-300.

PMID:
41225382
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Nov 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.