Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Association between daily caffeine intake and uterine fibroids: Results from NHANES 1999-2006.

Created on 06 Dec 2025

Authors

Yahan Li, Yue Yu, Yafang Zheng, Yilin Li, Yinghong Hu, Yi Zhang, Zhiyi Zhou, Jie Tang

Published in

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. Dec 06, 2025. Epub Dec 06, 2025.

Abstract

To investigate associations between daily caffeine intake and uterine fibroids (UF) among US women of reproductive age.
This cross-sectional analysis used NHANES data from 1999 to 2006. The sample included 4712 women aged 20-50 years. Daily caffeine intake was assessed through 24-h dietary recalls. Caffeine consumption was categorized using the FDA-recommended threshold of 400 mg per day. UF diagnosis was based on physician confirmation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore relationships. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was also performed.
The mean age was 34.04 ± 8.90 years. UF were reported by 12% of participants (n = 524). High caffeine consumers (>400 mg/day) showed elevated UF risk. This elevated risk disappeared after age adjustment. RCS analysis revealed a biphasic relationship. Protective effects occurred at low doses (<71.5 mg/day). Risk elevation appeared beyond this threshold, which was much lower than FDA guidelines.
This study demonstrates a dose-dependent relationship between caffeine and UF. Risk elevation occurs above 71.5 mg per day. These findings suggest a need to reconsider caffeine guidelines for hormone-dependent conditions. The results support personalized dietary counseling for UF prevention.

PMID:
41351346
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Dec 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 75
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement