Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

SURGICAL OUTCOMES AND RECOVERY IN CONVENTIONAL VERSUS MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE IN A MIDDLE-INCOME HEALTHCARE SYSTEM.

Created on 11 Dec 2025

Authors

L Tsertsvadze, G Sulaberidze, M Khinikadze, V Kipiani, D Tatoshvili

Published in

Georgian medical news. Issue 367. Pages 59-64.

Abstract

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - TLIF (MIS-TLIF) may reduce perioperative morbidity compared with conventional open TLIF, but evidence from middle-income healthcare systems is limited.
To compare clinical outcomes, radiological fusion, and early postoperative recovery between open TLIF and MIS-TLIF.
Forty-one patients undergoing one- to three-level TLIF for degenerative lumbar conditions were retrospectively analyzed (22 open, 19 MIS). Outcomes included operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, pain intensity (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), radiation exposure, and fusion grade (Bridwell system).
MIS-TLIF was associated with shorter operative times (267±14 vs. 351±12 min), lower blood loss (107±4 vs. 331±25 mL), and shorter hospitalization (4.2±0.3 vs. 6.7±0.5 days; all P < 0.0001). Early pain recovery was faster (VAS on day 12: 1.3 vs. 2.2; P ≤ 0.0007). Functional improvement, assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at approximately 6 months postoperatively, paralleled these findings, decreasing from 85.63±5.18% to 10.27±2.66% in the open TLIF group, and from 85.47±6.21% to 6.10±2.70% in the MIS-TLIF group. Fusion rates were comparable, while fluoroscopic exposure was higher in MIS-TLIF (137.8±9.6 vs. 53.2±3.1 μGy). No complications occurred in MIS-TLIF; open TLIF had one revision for cage migration and one superficial wound infection.
MIS-TLIF provides superior perioperative outcomes and faster early pain recovery with comparable fusion rates. Increased radiation exposure remains a consideration. These findings support MIS-TLIF as an effective alternative to open TLIF in middle-income healthcare settings.

PMID:
41370684
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Dec 2025.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 16
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement