Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Digitized Canine Olfaction and Multimodal Biosensing for Breath-Based Multi-Cancer Detection: A Hypothesis-Driven Perspective.

Created on 11 Feb 2026

Authors

Minal Dakhave, Itamar Bitan, Promit Moitra, Akash Kulgod

Published in

Journal of breath research. Feb 10, 2026. Epub Feb 10, 2026.

Abstract

Multi-Cancer Early Detection (MCED) is critical for reducing cancer mortality, however current screening technologies have limitations in accessibility, cost, and early stage sensitivity. Breath-based detection using volatile organic compounds (VOCs) offers a non-invasive and scalable alternative, with trained detection dogs demonstrating exceptional olfactory sensitivity in clinical studies. However, the widespread deployment of canine scent detection has been hindered by subjectivity and lack of standardization. This perspective article proposes a novel canine olfaction based MCED platform that analyzes olfactory recognition using EEG signals from trained dogs, combined with behavioral and physiological biomarkers (respiration, heart rate, vision tracking), and integrates these modalities via machine learning to produce a cancer risk score. We review the biological and computational foundations of this approach, present preliminary validation strategies, and outline a phased experimental roadmap from EEG signal capture to clinical deployment. This bio-digital framework exemplified by the Dognosis platform offers a pathway toward reproducible, portable, scalable and low-cost cancer detection systems, particularly suited for deployment in low-resource settings. The proposed system may also extend to detection of infections, neurological disorders, and other VOC-associated diseases.

PMID:
41666476
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Feb 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 29
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement