Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Identification of plaque psoriasis subgroups based on peripheral blood immune cells subtypes and their relationship with biologic therapy efficacy: a single-center longitudinal cohort study in China.

Created on 13 Jun 2026

Authors

Ruizhen Liu, Tingyan Xie, Juan Zhao, Can Zuo, Qian Gao, Yehong Kuang

Published in

Expert opinion on biological therapy. Jun 13, 2026. Epub Jun 13, 2026.

Abstract

Psoriasis is an immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease with variable biologic therapy response. Current treatment selection lacks reliable predictive biomarkers for personalized decisions.
To identify distinct immunological patient subgroups based on peripheral blood immune cells and evaluate their association with biologic therapy efficacy.
This retrospective cohort study included 329 plaque psoriasis patients initiating first-time biologic therapy and 169 healthy controls. Peripheral blood flow cytometry data were analyzed using hierarchical clustering. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed time to PASI90 achievement among subgroups.
Psoriasis patients showed significantly elevated lymphocyte populations. Three distinct immunological clusters were identified: Cluster 1 (57.8%) with moderate T cells and low NK cells; Cluster 2 (27.7%) with decreased T cells and increased NK cells; and Cluster 3 (14.6%) with increased total lymphocytes. Cluster 1 patients achieved PASI90 significantly faster with both IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors (p < 0.001).
Peripheral blood flow cytometry identified distinct psoriasis immunophenotypes with significant differences in biologic therapy response, offering potential biomarkers for treatment selection and personalized medicine approaches.

PMID:
42287100
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement